1) This presentation is successful in the fact that it definately give a lot of information about uniform circular motion. It clearly explains the steps needed to find the formulas and the knowns. 2) I liked how this presentation had a lot of information and was interesting to look at. There wasnt too much information per slide and tit worked out well in its attempt to relay information. 3) this power point could improve by not having so many colors and pictures per slide. Its very interesting and pretty but its really too busy. Its also difficult to read the font because alot of the fonts are too similar to that of the color of the the background. 4) This presesntaion was consistant with the how to make a powerpoint presentation in some ways and not in others. While it didnt put too much info per slid still was a give a lot of information. it didnt follow the how to make a presentation rules however because it was too busy with all the colors and fonts. Also there was no consistency from slide to slide so the whole presentation didnt really go well together.
I thought that you guys did a very nice job of explaining it yourselves. Many of the other presentations simply took pictures from google and explained them, in your presentation you actually took the time to draw arrows and such to show how UCm really works. You did follow the format which Ms. Glazenburg presented on how to make a better presentation. The one thing I think you could have improved on like most people could have improved on that was you should have added more examples of UCM in real life.
1. The presentation was successful because many visuals were used to effectively teach UCM. Also, very few words were used, but the words that were used were precise and to the point. 2. I really liked how the visuals dictated the presentation. The visuals were not only many but each visual was relevant to the presentation. Also, I liked how the information was divided into small bits and pieces. It made it easier for me to stay engaged in the presentation. 3. I felt that the examples of centripetal force could have been explained better. For example, instead of showing in a visual that Fc was equal to gravity by drawing arrows, there could have been a blurb above the visual that said "Fc=Gravity." 4. I felt that, for the most part, the style of the presentation was consistent with the expectations stated in the "How to Make a PowerPoint" assignment. The information was broken up over many slides, and the visuals were the primary source used to teach the lesson, not words.
1) This presentation was very successful because of it's visual power, and it's helpful facts and formulas
2) I liked how the info was pushed into small easy to understand sections, unlike larrge paragraphs of blabberin on and on and on and on.
3)I would have liked a little more info, and maybe a few more pictures but the presentation was well rounded
4) It was good that they took the "how to make a powerpoint" into consideration, this was waay better than many of the poor excuses of powerpoints for the first round of projects.
This was a good presentation. It got the point across and explained things nicely, however some of the pictures seemed a little out of focus which took away from the appearance. I liked that it didnt have too much writing on each slide though.
5 comments:
1) This presentation is successful in the fact that it definately give a lot of information about uniform circular motion. It clearly explains the steps needed to find the formulas and the knowns.
2) I liked how this presentation had a lot of information and was interesting to look at. There wasnt too much information per slide and tit worked out well in its attempt to relay information.
3) this power point could improve by not having so many colors and pictures per slide. Its very interesting and pretty but its really too busy. Its also difficult to read the font because alot of the fonts are too similar to that of the color of the the background.
4) This presesntaion was consistant with the how to make a powerpoint presentation in some ways and not in others. While it didnt put too much info per slid still was a give a lot of information. it didnt follow the how to make a presentation rules however because it was too busy with all the colors and fonts. Also there was no consistency from slide to slide so the whole presentation didnt really go well together.
I thought that you guys did a very nice job of explaining it yourselves. Many of the other presentations simply took pictures from google and explained them, in your presentation you actually took the time to draw arrows and such to show how UCm really works. You did follow the format which Ms. Glazenburg presented on how to make a better presentation. The one thing I think you could have improved on like most people could have improved on that was you should have added more examples of UCM in real life.
1. The presentation was successful because many visuals were used to effectively teach UCM. Also, very few words were used, but the words that were used were precise and to the point.
2. I really liked how the visuals dictated the presentation. The visuals were not only many but each visual was relevant to the presentation. Also, I liked how the information was divided into small bits and pieces. It made it easier for me to stay engaged in the presentation.
3. I felt that the examples of centripetal force could have been explained better. For example, instead of showing in a visual that Fc was equal to gravity by drawing arrows, there could have been a blurb above the visual that said "Fc=Gravity."
4. I felt that, for the most part, the style of the presentation was consistent with the expectations stated in the "How to Make a PowerPoint" assignment. The information was broken up over many slides, and the visuals were the primary source used to teach the lesson, not words.
1) This presentation was very successful because of it's visual power, and it's helpful facts and formulas
2) I liked how the info was pushed into small easy to understand sections, unlike larrge paragraphs of blabberin on and on and on and on.
3)I would have liked a little more info, and maybe a few more pictures but the presentation was well rounded
4) It was good that they took the "how to make a powerpoint" into consideration, this was waay better than many of the poor excuses of powerpoints for the first round of projects.
This was a good presentation. It got the point across and explained things nicely, however some of the pictures seemed a little out of focus which took away from the appearance. I liked that it didnt have too much writing on each slide though.
Post a Comment